Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biodynamic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Biodynamics. Nothing prevents anyone from taking further editorial decisions such as moves or edits. Stifle (talk) 11:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biodynamic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3 WP:PTM's, one of which does not even mention this word. Deprodded without explanation or improvement. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are two main groups of topics for this – those associated with Steiner's idea of biodynamic agriculture – and those associated with the dynamics of biological systems. The latter is poorly served currently so there is much scope for expansion and so WP:ATD applies, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." See Biodynamics for a book on the subject. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above comment. I also just added/removed entries on the page. WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 20:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Biodynamics - that should be the disambiguation, rather than redirecting to Biodynamic agriculture; this should be a redirect to that disambiguation. (Also obligatory facepalm for Andrew reliably and completey missing the point in favour of spouting the usual rote phrases.) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move per Elmidae; "Biodynamic" is a partial title match while "Biodynamics" is a plausible alternate title. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 19:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 08:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Biodynamics as the most-general term. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search. Biodynamics is fine as it is: the term is not ambiguous because Biodynamic massage isn't known as "Biodynamics". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.