Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biodiversivist
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 05:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The term is a neologism coined by the article's original author. Googling for the term reveals that it is used almost exclusively by said author, usually as a penname or in reference to himself. Even if the term were widespread, there's not much to say about it except that it means 'biodivisity preservationist'. The article is linked to from a list of environmental topics, but nothing else. Deh 20:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete The same distinction mentioned in the artical quite a contreversal issue in conservation terms could posibly merge as a critique of Conservation movement. --Salix alba (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism. Stifle 09:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.