Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binibining Pilipinas winners

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Binibining Pilipinas. postdlf (talk) 21:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Binibining Pilipinas winners[edit]

Binibining Pilipinas winners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant article. The list is already in the Binibining Pilipinas article. AR E N Z O Y 1 6At a l k 05:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Binibining Pilipinas as a possible search term. I'm surprised this wasn't done earlier. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Binibining Pilipinas as a WP:CFORK. Weird because the content in the charts overlap but not perfectly. It's like two parallel winner's charts with slightly different content in each. Looks like some well meaning IP and red-link users decided to make their own chart with extra info, but it should have been done in the main article not a separate article. --Green Cardamom (talk) 17:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.