Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binary Hammer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Binary Hammer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG Coin945 (talk) 01:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- uncited since 2009. Nine years is plenty of chances to demonstrate notability which has not happened in this case. An unnecessary directory listing. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.