Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billion Dollar Gravy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. Nominator stated withdrawal on my talk page. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Billion Dollar Gravy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Just created, but no notability is established by this album. A Disclog is the only sources available and does not establish any notability. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:N. SRX 18:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought music albums were notable if a notable artist created them. London Elektricity is more than qualified, having won several music awards and being a pioneer of live drum and bass, but if you want to delete it, that's okay. If you don't believe me, look at this. DubCrazy (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)DubCrazy[reply]
- With my latest edits to the article, I have also included four reviews of Billion Dollar Gravy, from magazine and internet sources. DubCrazy (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)DubCrazy[reply]
- Keep: I've tidied the article up, and added an infobox and cats. And the included link to a review in The Guardian would definitely establish notability in my eyes. --Kaini (talk) 20:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Reviews from major magazines should merit an article.-Inzweep (talk) 20:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.