Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billboard Top 40 of 1980

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting all of them per consensus. MelanieN (talk) 02:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard Top 40 of 1980[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply WP:IINFO, plus title of article is not clearly depicting what the list is about. A more specific title, from what I gather about this list, would be something like "List of Billboard Hot 100 top 40 singles in 1980". Nevertheless, we have lists for number-one singles and top 10 singles on the Hot 100, and we don't need to be creating lists for additional, arbitrary depths of the chart. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to add these related articles, with the same rationale for deletion:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I can't defend its existence but it was created as a split-off from the main music articles, in which it formed a superfluous section. Deb (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as WP:IINFO. I think we're stretching it with the top 10 list. There may as well be a list of every song that reached the Billboard Hot 100 should these stay. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. WP:IINFO, specifically #3. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this seems questionable and may be best merged to a larger article. SwisterTwister talk 22:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - arbitrary cut-off points. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.