Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikini Karate Babes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bikini Karate Babes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable computer game. Per WP:NOT. MBisanz ^talk 06:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless someone comes up with some spectacular sourcing. Shadowjams (talk) 06:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. KzKrann (talk) 07:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep. Well, context aside, here's IGN review, and short Kotaku mention. I'm really out on if this establishes enough notability. — Hellknowz ▎talk 15:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There's an IGN review, a snippet on GamesRadar and this interviewer suggests that there was media coverage at the time, it's likely to be in mags as well. TBH you timed this AFD to crapfection MBisanz, considering that serious news of the game's sequel apparently surfaced a week ago, 8 years after the original game's release XD Someone another 16:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Coverage is on par with other video games. (ZOMG, more porn in Wikipedia!) Pcap ping 17:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Softcore erotica at best :P— Hellknowz ▎talk 19:07, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I'm switching due to the above... I guess it did rank "abysmal", which has to be worth something. Shadowjams (talk) 02:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Apparently a sequel is coming, which is likely to garner media attention. This article will therefore come up in searches as the precursor to it. Imaria Prime (talk) 00:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Prequel does not become notable just because its sequel does. Appearing in searches is more so reason to keep this article sourced and notability well established. — Hellknowz ▎talk 01:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — This game received press from many different sources upon its release and has since been followed with an equally-notable sequel. White 720 (talk) 03:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – It's received coverage in multiple independent sources to satisfy notability here. –MuZemike 14:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.