Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bihariji Maharaj
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bihariji Maharaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 03:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article needs referencing, expansion, and copyediting, but it appears to be about a significant piece of local infrastructure. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable, no sources. Even the Bharunda article, where this building supposedly is, doesn't mention it. Channel ® 23:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment In the week since nominating this article, I have looked for sources, and have found none. If anybody knows of any sources, especially reliable sources, please feel free to add them to the article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Why does the link Bihariji Maharaj, a guru redirect to Bharunda (a town)????????? Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable. No third party sources found.Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.