Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 21:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bigly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a list of external links and paraphrasing or direct quotes, failing WP:INDISCRIMINATE. In addition, although it looks like there are a multitude of reliable sources, however it looks like this is WP:ROUTINE, especially with this election. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO (probably the closest thing that will cover this kind of article). In addition, this article is terrible, it's a list of links and some quotes from them. Perhaps a sentence about this topic in the Donald Trump article would be okay, but this word doesn't merit its own article. Sheepythemouse (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable supposed word. A word does not become notable because an American politician uses it. Not necessarily a reason for deletion but the article is not of acceptable quality. AusLondonder (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Substubbify and then transwiki to Wiktionary. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 15:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article fails WP:N. This is also a very poor article that reflects negatively upon the project. {MordeKyle} ☢ 02:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Sheepy. Don't even bother with sending it to Wiktionary. South Nashua (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.