Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Rock Creative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Big Rock Creative

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo piece on a non-notable startup. Sources cited don't even mention the company, they merely verify the existence of the event (some might say, they're perhaps there to give the impression of solid sourcing, but that would be cynical and non-AGF...). At best this has single-event-notability of sorts, but nowhere near enough to warrant an article. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article, does not meet WP:NCORP. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mildly stunned to review the TechCrunch article and find this company isn't even mentioned in the source. 10/10 for promoballs, 0/10 for notability. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Suonii180 (talk) 13:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not a big surprise that I'd like a chance to improve this article. I acknowledge the feedback and I'm looking into those issues. Thank you for the information links. I have a few specific questions regarding how to improve the content/structure of this article that I'd love to ask a more experienced writer. Is that possible here? Or? Thank you, Krista404 (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can find a lot of help and support at the Teahouse - Wikipedia:Teahouse - if that's what you truly need. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This company fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Passing mentions only in articles, if even mentioned. Missvain (talk) 21:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sources provided don't provide any coverage of the company, and my searching finds nothing sufficient to satisfy WP:NCORP. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.