Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother Second Life

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, any future merge proposal is an editorial matter. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother Second Life[edit]

I don't see how this is notable at all. It's unreferenced and in all means pointless. Tresiden (talk) 21:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per failing WP:Notability (web). I don't see how the subject is notable, or how it could be? (Can't find press coverage through google searches). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fraudy (talk • contribs) 01:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.Per Fraudy's reason.Gears Of War 03:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Ahem* 10-second Google search reveals sources from Reuters and the BBC. Miremare 05:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The {{afd1}} notice had not been placed on the article. This has now been corrected.Gazimoff ^Write _Read 10:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - reliable sources to verify the article and demonstrate notability have now been identified, which I have incorporated into the article. Gazimoff ^Write _Read 10:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as of demonstrable notability, and thanks to User:Miremare for digging up the sources. Ford MF (talk) 15:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Second Life. Seeing as it was a sponsored event, it could easily be put into the Second Life article.
Merge into Second Life and forward page. Virek (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Due to significant coverage in multiple reliable sources establishing notability. Considering the length of the Second Life article cannot see how a proper merge could take place. Davewild (talk) 13:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.