Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Breakfast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Big Breakfast[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, and poor sourcing. As well as COI issues. Slatersteven (talk) 14:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning delete. It's a declared paid edit, but someone's not getting value for money here :| I don't believe these dime-a-dozen web awards convey sufficient notability either. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- as per nom.--Rusf10 (talk) 16:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this and salt as a redirect to The Big Breakfast; this is much less delicious WP:SPAM than the McDonald's variety which basically drops multiple blue links in a hope to clinch WP:N, which it doesn't by a country mile. Nate • (chatter) 17:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Overt promotion violating policy WP:PROMO and display of gallery of awards which occupy total space more than the prose, this is blatant misusing of Wikipedia. In summary this is classic example of Vanispamcruftisement –Ammarpad (talk) 17:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTSPAM. No indication that the company is notable yet, so there's nothing to salvage. If deleted the redirect to The Big Breakfast should be restored. – Joe (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a CollegeHumor spin-out production company that is now part of Electus. The referencing is atrocious, the content is straight off their website. The awards listed are largely from before the studio was founded. Any encyclopedic content could be added to one of the two linked articles, but I see none that needs to be merged, and as noted above there are other uses of the term that this should redirect for instead. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.