Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bicycle law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bicycle law[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article provides no real information, and seems to merely be someone's opinion piece on bicycle laws. Standard editing would not be sufficient to fix this page. Page should not be on Wikipedia until extremely major changes are made. Harutsedo2 (talk) 00:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The lede gives enough information and sources that the topic is notable. The two opinion essays, one on the USA and one on China, should be removed. Kitfoxxe (talk) 03:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It seems notable and could be expanded. -- Dane2007 ^talk 05:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I've removed the essays as hopeless, but the two subsidiary articles Bicycle law in the United States and Bicycle helmet laws are both cited, and sufficient to show the topic is notable. UK cycling law and French cycling law are clearly suitable subtopics also. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Expansion is certainly not unforeseeable. As a cyclist, this is not something I would never think to check on Wikipedia. I'm sure translations from other Wikis could be also incorporated. --FuzzyGopher (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.