Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibek Ojha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bibek Ojha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No independent RS coverage. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Article has zero reliable references with citations to inappropriate references such as YouTube. My WP:BEFORE search yielded nothing.4meter4 (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage in any reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.