Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bib2x
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bib2x[edit]
Non notable new software, fails Wikipedia:Notability (software), only 273 Google hits (64 distinct ones, 47 excluding Wikipedia links) Fram 08:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (as original prod'er) per nom. Looks new and non-notable. Fan-1967 14:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no need for us to become a freshmeat mirror. I looked for evidence of widespread usage, including the "do distros package it?" test. Results point to NN. My Alt Account 17:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete. Free software/open source.--elwikipedista 19:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, is that all it takes to get in Wikipedia? In that case, I'd better hurry up and write a very detailed article on this, it's open source! My Alt Account 19:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP is not Sourceforge. Valrith 21:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, My Alt Account and Valrith. If the consensus is delete, the link to here in BibTeX should probably be moved to the External Links section and changed to a link directly to the software website. I presume Bib-it will be up on the chopping block next. Michael Kinyon 11:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Markovich292 05:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.