Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biagio Gramaticopolo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biagio Gramaticopolo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. No reliable independent coverage of the player, only results and passing coverage. Adamtt9 (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep doesn't meet WP:NTENNIS but does meet WP:GNG he has articles with Significant coverage even though he isn't the main topic of those articles with the main topic being him (almost) winning tournaments. These sources are also reliable and the same sources have been used in other wikipedia pages with no issues. The rest of GNG is clearly met i belive. I hope this cleared up any questions you had. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikieboy1 (talk • contribs) 12:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Nom. I am trying to type without laughing. I hadn't considered that someone would advocate notability based on the "lowest ranked person on the ATP singles ranking." or on "(almost) winning tournaments." Losing is bad but almost winning is notable. Learn something every day. -- Otr500 (talk) 03:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.