Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhargavacharitham Moonam Khandam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhargavacharitham Moonam Khandam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as only 1 reliable review was found in a WP:BEFORE (Sify) that could help support. At least 2 are needed. There are 3 reviews in the article, but according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force, only the Sify one is reliable. The other 2 are not. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The selective quoting of Afd best practices while flouting Afd norms is interesting. Please read WP:AFD, or more specifically the checks to be done before nominating at WP:BEFORE, the 4th section of which lists the requirement to search for additional sources. WP:ICTFFAQ which you quote includes Rediff as a reliable source and a cursory search would have yielded this - [1] thereby meeting the requirement of 2 mainstream reviews. Please therefore refrain from jumping the gun when your PROD fails and look for sources before nominating for deletion. Jupitus Smart 05:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: With two full reviews at Rediff and Sify, it meets the requirements of NFILM. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: passes WP:NFILM per WP:NFO -- DaxServer (talk) 15:31, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.