Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharati Matha Burial Temple - IV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bharati Matha. Courcelles 17:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bharati Matha Burial Temple - IV[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Four virtually identical pages, no references, final sentence (The Date of Documentation is 22.12.2006 by Dr. Sadasiba Pradhan & team.) suggests copied from unknown source Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Bharati Matha for now. As far as I can tell, this, and other such articles are describing one of nine burial temples located within the Bharati Matha Temple complex which appears, based on the article description, to be some historically, culturally, and/or archaeologically significant site. Most of the text is the same, and should be discarded in a merge. There is a difference towards the end of the article which describes the dimensions and setting for each individual burial temple. I do have concerns about possible original research, but it would probably be best dealt with after merging, and discussed together at the single article. -- Whpq (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Bharati Matha as above. Biscuittin (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge will be fine with me. It was plain that 4 very similar articles was not the way to go. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:37, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I support a merge. Hazard-SJ ± 02:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added sections to the Bharati Matha Burial Temple articles. I think merging them with Bharati Matha would make the latter article very long. Would it be better to merge the four Burial Temple articles into one article named Bharati Matha Burial Temples? Biscuittin (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply The Bharati Matha is not that large. The amount of text to actually merge is very small. -- Whpq (talk) 11:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have consensus for a merger with Bharati Matha? If so, I am ready to do it. Biscuittin (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply - Patience. The discussion normally closes after 7 days. -- Whpq (talk) 20:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.