Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagwant Anmol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 09:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagwant Anmol[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails generally notability guidelines. Hardly any independent hits on Google search, the article itself lacks any reliable reference. Plus a promotional tone. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 11:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Well intentioned perhaps, but still an autobiography that seems to fail WP:BIO, WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. I was unable to source the claim about the work being ...the best selling Hindi novel of 2012. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, quite possibly speedily. I have worked a bit on the article to prune some of the promotional language, and have also looked for secondary sources without finding anything. --bonadea contributions talk 11:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

save page , this is important page for hindi literature readers. I don't think this sholud be deleted. I don't want to delete it. please suggest us to save this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashishukla1992 (talk • contribs) 12:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC) — Ashishukla1992 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Don't delete I have worked in this article and i have also read Bhagwant Anmol. He should not be deleted. This is good information. this article should be kept.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Prateek8 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)— Prateek8 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Most authors pass notability on AUTHOR #3, multiple book reviews in reliable sources. Has anyone reviewed these books in newspapers or magazines? -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nope.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 07:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete I have added articles in newspapers and one review of The perfect love by sudheer maurya. If you want multiple reviews, then give me time for one to two months. I will share hundreds of reviews about his book, because his second book is releasing this month. Otherwise your choice (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashishukla1992 (talk • contribs)

Sudheer review is a personal blog, needs to be published in newspaper or magazine with editorial oversight (newspaper blog OK), see WP:RS. I hope it gets 100s of reviews but maybe for now copy and save the article to your homepage and when new sources are available recreate it with the updated information but be sure the sources are reliable from places like The Hindu, etc.. or these 102 places (click "show index"), otherwise it will just be deleted again. About 3 reviews would probably be enough for me to vote Keep, depending on the length of the review and size of newspaper. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.