Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond the newsroom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Beyond the newsroom[edit]
- Beyond the newsroom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essay, steaming pile of WP:OR, Delete per WP:NOT WuhWuzDat 14:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; this is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. J Milburn (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research, essay-like, unreferenced, no defined topic so no demonstrable notability. WP:NOT. Chzz ► 14:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Surprised there isn't a speedy deletion category for this kind of thing. Figureofnine (talk) 15:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable topic, lacks reliable sources, also WP:OR and WP:ESSAY as said above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No kidding: this is original research at its finest. WP:ESSAY seems to apply a lot here too. The New Raymie (t • c) 18:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just for the record, I previously speedied a different article at this same title, which just happened to have been created by the same user who created this one. The earlier article, incidentally, was an unreferenced advertisement for a novel (which may cast some fresh light on this version of the article, or it may not.) What was especially fascinating about it was this: article creator = User:Oswaldpereira; author of the novel, according to the article = Oswald Pereira. So in addition to all the above reasons why this article shouldn't exist in this form, add WP:COI to the menu too. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Joaquin008 (talk) 16:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.