Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Ex-Gay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond Ex-Gay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:GNG. This is an article about a website, namely beyondexgay.com. It is not an article about a movement, a group, or a concept; that article is already present at Ex-ex-gay. This is just an article about a non-notable website; it is so non-notable, that Alexa doesn't have enough data to rank it, and the home page copyright lists only 2007-2013. One might suggest a merge to Ex-ex-gay, but there is nothing here worth saving, with the possible exception of the url itself, which could be added to External links. Mathglot (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: article creator and all contributors having over 2% of total bytes have been notifed. Mathglot (talk) 01:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Mathglot (talk) 01:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Mathglot (talk) 01:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. Regarding the url as External link: per WP:EL#What to link I don't see any reason to mention the website in Ex-ex-gay#External links, but I don't see a reason to exclude it either, if someone wishes to have it. There's already completely dead websites there, so why not this one. Mathglot (talk) 01:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not seem to be notable, nothing here that needs saving through merging. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't see the sources supporting notability.★Trekker (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The sexual-orientation-alteration survivors' movement is notable, this website is not. Carrite (talk) 16:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.