Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Desire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 20:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond Desire[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a suitable and reliable review from TV Guide. Needs one more suitable and reliable review per NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 08:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 08:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Added a few sources to the page, including the TV Guide review mentioned above. See for yourself.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There is also a review in the Montgomery Advertiser. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 12:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I speedy withdraw nomination per consensus and per newly added sources. The Film Creator (talk) 15:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.