Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Between Heaven and Earth (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Between Heaven and Earth (film)[edit]

Between Heaven and Earth (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NFILM issues are apparent. No references provided; only an IMDb external link. DJAustin (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 20:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 20:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Two references have since been added by Sdslkd which appear credible and demonstrate WP:GNG compliance. Particularly since this is a 1960 film from Egypt, online sources should be expected to be light, but the Google Books search link and a Google Scholar search both indicate scholarly interest. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 09:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Sdslkd (talk) 01:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 09:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think these old Egyptian film articles can be expanded, notability can be established and they can be of encyclopedic value. Hoverfish Talk 20:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Easily passes WP:NFILM now. -- Dane talk 00:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the additional sources added to the article and the evidence of academic coverage enable WP:GNG to be passed. It is better to prod before AFD to enable refs to be added. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.