Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Bakker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 20:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Betty Bakker[edit]
- Betty Bakker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. Zero refs. Tagged for notability since 2009.Epeefleche (talk) 04:10, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Epeefleche (talk) 05:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of sources provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per above, no sources, doesn't appear to be notable, been tagged for notability since 09, nothing appears to have been done to show she is notable in any way. Nath1991 (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete She is not notable in any way, thus meaning her article has no significant meaning or interest to people.Dusty777 (talk) 17:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely unsourced, thus very likely non-notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 21:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.