Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betrinac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy to User talk:Sam1liverpool/Betrinac. Userfied as per author's request Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Betrinac

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about an specific medical product. It reads like the description probably on the supplement's box. No notability asserted. —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 20:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The journal references are certainly to reliable sources but they don't relate to the specific product, merely its contents. No notability is asserted or present, or discernable upon a brief search, and this is pretty much advertising. Ubelowme (talk) 21:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This appears to be a non-notable commercial product. If there is any useful information relating to the potential benefits of the various vitamin components, that content belongs elsewhere in the relevant articles. Deli nk (talk) 17:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will update the page concerning its "notability". Of relevance is that some information pertaining to notability will be in the public domain within the next few days. For instance, one example is that Betrinac is mentioned in a Book due to be published in the next few days: See: http://www.amazon.com/Pernicious-Anaemia-Forgotten-consequences-deficiency/dp/1781610045/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339889202&sr=8-1&keywords=Martyn+Hooper. Sam1liverpool (talk) 23:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the page to improve its notability. Sam1liverpool (talk) 16:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.