Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Betking[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created in Draft, and the draft declined twice (see User talk:Mickyskidy and Draft:Betking). The user achieved autoconfirmed status and immediately created the article in mainspace. I have removed PR content, which was immediately reverted by the creator. What sources there are, are canonical examples of routine coverage - mainly based on press releases. In short, this is spam and while I have to assume that the "Created by Mickyskidy" in the infobox refers to the article not the company, the behaviour makes it look like COI (editor's other work includes arguing for links to his website, which has been blacklisted due to spamming). Guy (help! - typo?) 12:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete spam. Mccapra (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The references are all based on PR material. No clear assertion of notability. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nom. -Roxy the sycamore. wooF 10:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam by a now-banned user. Fails GNG and looks like a duck.49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.