Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth dariti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beth dariti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The majority of references seem to be self-published, there doesn't seem to be a large amount of independent, reliable stuff out there. There's a review or two of this person's work, but nothing from a major publication or other reliable source. Seems to fall well below the standards outlined at WP:GNG. Also, author appears to have a major conflict of interest. Jayron32 00:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I spent a good bit of time looking for any independent, third-party, reliable sources that could provide a basis for a finding of notability and be used to verify the content but I found none at all. If the person who was editing the article and appears to have a close connection to the subject reads this, the links in the last sentence are really for you. You would likely have a much better idea of where reliable independent sources we are looking were published, if they exist, but may not have known that that's what we look for.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment just to be clear you want to delete Beth Dariti as well as Beth dariti the page which redirects to it I assume ---- _nonsense ferret 01:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously. The redirection happened after the nomination. The discussion is about the suitability of the subject for a stand-alone article, not over technical details. --Jayron32 01:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 18:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.