Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best (Chicosci album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best (Chicosci album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insignificant compilation album that fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. It compiles material from notable albums, but notability is not inherited to this subject. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:NMUSIC, makes no claim to notability. No redirect, nothing significant to merge to Chicosci. Other Chicosci albums appear to lack independent notability, such as Chicosci (album). --Bejnar (talk) 19:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 17:22, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a nn, compilation album. Does not meet WP:NMUSIC. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.