Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beru Revue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beru Revue[edit]

Beru Revue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The principal attempt at a notability claim here is that they had "one notable radio hit", but without any attempt at sourcing that the song was ever actually a hit -- NMUSIC #2 looking for IFPI-certified national pop charts on the order of Billboard, while music publicity mavens tend to indiscriminately attach the word "hit" to any song that ever got played on any radio station at all, so a song isn't automatically a notability-clinching "hit" just because you call it one without proper sourcing for that. But there's no other strong notability claim here at all, the referencing is entirely to (deadlinked) primary sourcing and blogs that aren't support for notability without a shred of WP:GNG-building coverage about them shown, and the article has been flagged as needing better referencing since 2010 without improvement.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 14:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: A few articles in the Delco Times; [1] is an example. I'm not sure how good of a source it is. Oaktree b (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Meets GNG. In addition to the above article in the Delco Times, I was able to find [2] [3] [4] ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 16:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – An easy pass per the WP:THREE raised by Editorofthewiki. TLAtlak 02:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.