Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkay Çatak (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 23:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Berkay Çatak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First discussion closed as no consensus a month ago. Most sources in the article are about his creation, Gören Duyan. These make the company notable, not him. "Kimdir?" kind of sources are dismissed on trwiki as they are mostly, regardless of the publisher, not independent (explanation). The only source that contributes to notability is the Hürriyet one, which means this person doesn't meet GNG.

Interestingly the article of Gören Duyan and this person have been created across multiple projects by the same user, even in languages they don't speak, a pattern that most of the time points towards a COI. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 18:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 18:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 18:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 19:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

keep, it was already discussed a month ago, i don't think the second one is needed. My previous review: "Meets the notability criteria. There are many news on the person. An encyclopedic content was created with the resources provided.".--𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ ^Heyyo? 17:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was closed as no consensus, so it doesn't mean it can't be re-nominated. "Meets the notability criteria", no he doesn't. "There are many news on the person", no there aren't. COI declaration when? ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 10:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.