Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin "Knox" Washington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of characters in Heroes. ~ L'Aquatique[talk] 04:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin "Knox" Washington

Minor characters from Heroes that lacks notability, and may be better served in List of characters in Heroes, and is already listed in List of Heroes characters with special abilities. Earlier Prod was contested. — Edokter • Talk • 14:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and/or Redirect to list article. No reason for a short recurring villain to have a separate article. gnfnrf (talk) 15:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some props to Sylar07 for writing this article (and adding quote boxes), but ~~delete~~ as not notable. –thedemonhog talk • edits 16:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a shame, because I'm certain that Knox will be a major character by the end of this series - I think he's appeared in every episode so far - but unfortunately, he's not yet notable. --WORM | MЯOW 17:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, let's redirect it in case he becomes notable later. –thedemonhog talk • edits 18:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom lacks real world notability ; no coverage by third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 18:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Heroes presents, via the novels and the episodes, one or two new characters per week. I am not sure about the actor's contract. If we have any sign that we can gain notability we have convert to a redirect to list of heroes with special abilities. Creation of articles for characters who just appeared in a show is WP:RECENTISM. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I'm pretty new to the whole process of creating articles, so I'm certain I don't understand every wikipedia editing guideline and regulation, but I think this article is worthwile, or at least will be, so, if it is deleted, I'm ok with that, but I will keep the article if it is appropriate to write in the future. Sylar07 00:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylar07 (talk • contribs)

You can create a subpage in your userspace and make any improvements there. IF you have a good version you can present it to the Wikiproject Heroes. Happy editing! -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect without deletion, per custom with similar articles. No need for a separate article now, but also no point in deleting it. --Ckatz^chat _spy 00:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, don't delete, per Ckatz. - Josh (talk | contribs) 01:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does anyone know anything about the actor's contract? -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, don't delete, per Ckatz. - Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 09:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.