Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benisha Poudel (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 01:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Benisha Poudel[edit]

Benisha Poudel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur singer with no notability. Fails the general and singer-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Women, and Nepal. UtherSRG (talk) 11:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - This article was ruled a "soft" delete on September 23, just two days ago. If I am reading the history correctly, it appears that the article's creator simply removed the AfD notice and carried on, and the article was never actually deleted. Now it has been nominated for deletion again as if something different will happen this time. See the exact same course of events at David Shankar, with the same article creator involved. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No it was deleted and then requested to be restored via WP:RFU. This request was fulfilled (which is why the AFD tag was removed). I then created the 2nd AFD. UtherSRG (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One question remains: what is the likelihood of anything different happening this time? I'm undecided as a voter and it appears that few others are interested, so therefore I'm seeing wasteful bureaucracy. Sorry for all the copy/pasting. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep - There are lots or reliable, notable refrences on article, which clearly meet WP:GNG and and singer-specific notability policies.As per information please read. [1] 2 3 4 Endrabcwizart (talk) 16:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • procedural keep & Comment - keep as per |1, this was the actual main reasons, & I would request to all(for participate this afd and close.). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Endrabcwizart (talkcontribs)
    • You have already !voted keep once, please strike one of them. Your link is not reason for a procedural keep when @UtherSRG: was not the nominator. Star Mississippi 21:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.