Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benicia High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Benicia High School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure. -- Lhimec (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is this school notable? I am not sure. The band participated in the Tournament of Roses Parade but I don't know what else about the school is newsworthy. -- Lhimec (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – per long-term consensus as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools), secondary school articles are typically retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I disagree with current pratice on this subject (why do we need an article on every single high school?), but consensus has determined that high school articles should be kept unless it cannot be proven that the school even exists, per the second bullet-point on WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. It can rather plainly be shown that this school exists, so therefore it should be kept. --Biblioworm (talk) 01:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per consensus at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Thanks, I didn't know about the consensus. How do we close the discussion? -- C (talk) 20:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lhimec: As there are no delete !votes you can withdraw it or alternatively let it run its course and someone will close when the seven days from the original nomination are up. Philg88 ^♦talk 18:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep - Per each and everyone above. Common outcomes has provided a consensus for these discussions. --TTTommy111 (talk) 06:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.