Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bengal Tiger (2001 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal Tiger (2001 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE. All currents sources are database sites.

PROD removed with "Take it to AfD" with no improvements/reviews added. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:NOTDATABASE. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Here I found [1] which i also added in the article from This Rotten Tomatoes review page on the movie itself, Which alongside the fact of notable casts like Mithun Chakraborty and Shakti Kapoor being in the movie makes it pass the GNG.Surya^beej ^⋠talk⋡ 09:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Donaldd23. The keep vote appears to misunderstand that being on Rotten Tomatoes (RT) doesn't indicate notability. RT is a database the aggregates reviews from other sites, in this case the film has zero reviews found by RT, and being listed on a database doesn't indicate notability at all, falling under [examples] of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "capsule reviews", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, Time Out Film Guide, or the Internet Movie Database. The refs I found are trivial, see 1, 2, so this fails WP:GNG (requiring multiple independent reliable significant sources, not just trivial mentions and databases), and WP:NFILM. Also a note- films don't inherit notability because of notable actors. VickKiang (talk) 22:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.