Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benevolent Dictator for Life

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep with a recommendation to merge the article into The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Pax:Vobiscum 15:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benevolent Dictator for Life

Oh come on. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, usage or jargon guide. Delete, or at least move to another Wikimedia Project. This isn't encyclopedic. ~ Wikihermit 23:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep about a concept, with adequate sources. (The article is not about whom one might think it is, but I'd say keep even if it were) DGG 01:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Merge This concept seems primarily associated with The Cathedral and the Bazaar, and I suggest it be merged there. I don't see much to convince me it's significantly independent of the original essay. FrozenPurpleCube 02:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Per above. oysterguitarist~Talk 03:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/"skim and merge" to Guido van Rossum.--Chealer 12:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that should either be merged with The Cathedral and the Bazaar or left as an article. Andrew D White 13:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG. Capmango 17:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cwolfsheep 05:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Benevolent dictator#Open source "benevolent dictators". Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 14:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete after merging, per above. -- Bigwyrm 03:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.