Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benedict Lim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Benedict Lim[edit]
- Benedict Lim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable professional gamer. Ridernyc (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lack of reliable, third party sources. Notability not established. Sergecross73 msg me 13:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The subject fails the GNG. Are there any reliable sources any proponent wishes to cite, not counting gaming blogs? Ravenswing 13:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence he passes the GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.