Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Kull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ben_Kull[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination for deletion: Non-notability. Having a credit on a TV show does not equal notability per se. Would need coverage of the subject apart from just the credits. Sparkleatom (talk) 08:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC) — Sparkleatom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All I can find are listings which credit him for his work. There is no substantial coverage about him, nor any indication of awards or other critical acclaim that would distinguish him. As such, all I can verify is that he is a working writer. -- Whpq (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't seem to be anything about him online beyond inclusion in program credits. If the shows he worked on have staff lists in their articles, that's where he should be. 69.230.72.45 (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE Not notable. 64.81.36.52 (talk) 09:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.