Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Hansbrough
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 23:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ben Hansbrough[edit]
- Ben Hansbrough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Oh look, another redlinked afd that NO ONE ELSE ON THE WHOLE WIKI CAN BE ARSED TO FIX. Seems thin on sources, so I'll go with it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - procedurally this should probably be speedy-closed because the original nominator (User:BLGM5) did not provide a reason. Also, maybe Mr. Hammer should consider that most WP users are volunteers who are not here every single minute because we have jobs and stuff. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from Nom: Original reasoning was as follows. Not sure why it didn't come through. Blatantly fails WP:ATHLETE. Being the brother of Tyler Hansbrough does not make one notable. BLGM5 (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATH and lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.