Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Golub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Golub[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of references on companies he has been associated with, some to articles he has written, but nothing in detail from WP:RS on HIM. fails WP:BIO John from Idegon (talk) 05:39, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak keep~~ - there is at least some coverage of him in Bloomberg and other reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 16:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I don't see anything at Bloomberg other than a CV. Still not seeing it. John from Idegon (talk) 18:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While there are bits and pieces involving him, there's no substantial coverage of him specifically. Fails WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 01:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change my mind to weak delete based on the above discussion. I would not oppose the article's deletion. Bearian (talk) 17:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no real coverage of him. Fails WP:NOTEBLP. --Bejnar (talk) 03:50, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.