Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben C Williams
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 04:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ben C Williams[edit]
- Ben C Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. I cannot find significant coverage of this blogger/designer at multiple independent reliable sources to show that he meets the general notability guidelines or the guidelines for the notability of people.
Evaluation of sources provided in article:
- Williams, Ben. "bencwilliams.com". Retrieved 17 June 2011.
- Not independent of the subject
- "thesanctuaryedinburgh". Retrieved 20 June 2011.
- I can't find anything about Williams here, also appears self-published? Not sure it would meet the reliability criteria
- "stantonwilliams.com". Retrieved 19 June 2011.
- Company website where he father works - not about Ben C Williams
- Entry Paul Williams, Edited by reference, in the 2011 A & C Black edition of Who's Who.
- Details about father - not about Ben
- "kgbanswers.co.uk". Retrieved 20 June 2011.
- Confirms that the band he played in played a gig - but it's just a list of the bands who played, no other details.
None of these meet the significant coverage requirements of the notability guidelines or the independent/reliable source criteria PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, no real claim to notability; speedy tag removed by sock account. Hairhorn (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.