Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belobogism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belobogism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-referenced article lacking GHits or GNews hits to support premise. Perhaps a WP:OR based article. reddogsix (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an apparent hoax. Google search on Belobogism shows only 8 results, all from Wiki sites. No reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: as this AfD is still new, I have taken the liberty of bundling into it two related articles, by the same author, which clearly stand or fall with the main one. JohnCD (talk) 15:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete all - no reliable independent sources to indicate that this is notable, or indeed more than something made up one day. If not a hoax, it is at best original research. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all I'm not a believer....TheLongTone (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Made up stuff that should have been speedy deleted. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. I couldn't find anything on Belobogism that was independent of wikipedia and 2 items for Pierwodnica, neither of which was in English.~~----

I did find information, though, about mythological Belobog, an article that has been tagged as a copy and paste article, but is constructed better and more coherent.--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belobog not belobogism. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDY snowball delete. No need help to kook pollute internet with the help of wikipedia mirrors. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.