Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belly cast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Belly cast[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's plenty of google hits for this, but they're mostly blogs and YouTube videos. The article itself seems like a mix of neologism and how-to essay. Been tagged for reference improvement for three years. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think notability is debatable, but there is some coverage that might qualify as reliable sources[1][2][3][4][5][6]. But I wonder about merging to plaster cast - I don't think this is really more notable than penis casts or casts of other body parts, and the main article could be expanded to be more useful rather than having a lot of little articles. Colapeninsula (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Maybe not the most talked about topic over dinner, but it does carry a lot of weight. I simply went to Google books and you can see from this link [7] that it is talked about in numerous books. --TTTommy111 (talk) 00:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 15:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Those links above for 'news', 'books', and 'newspapers' have oodles of references that could be used to source and expand this article. This is an encyclopedic topic that easily meets WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. There seems to be enough material out there to warrant a stand-alone article, and this is much, much more notable than "penis casts". gobonobo ⁺ ^c 03:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.