Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarusian exonyms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that this is not valid content for wikipedia. Davewild (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Belarusian exonyms[edit]
- Belarusian exonyms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I fail to understand what encyclopedic content this article has. This is just an extremely inclomplete list of English-Belarusian translations of city names. Dzied Bulbash (talk) 19:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the article is currently completely unsourced, and the content is not completely obvious. If sources are added, I will strike my suggestion to delete, but I don't think it's an okay thing to have completely unsourced articles. CCG (T-C) 19:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain how this list is belong to encyclopedia. It is foreign language translation and nothing else, even with references. Dzied Bulbash (talk) 19:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a forgien phrasebook. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as per Doc Strange. Clearly fails WP:NOT. Ottre (talk) 20:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as obviously failing WP:NOT, but that isn't a speedy deletion criterion.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 20:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.