Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus–Slovenia relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus–Slovenia relations

Another one of those X-Y country relations articles that does not indicate notaibility. tempodivalse [☎] 00:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no embassies, no hint of notability. Yes, Belarusian propaganda made note of Slovenia's intention to improve EU-Belarus relations, but that was in Slovenia's role as EU president, not acting on its own autonomous initiative. - Biruitorul ^Talk 00:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^Dialogue 12:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^Dialogue 12:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Having searched in English and Russian, I can't find anything giving notability or extended periods of contacts between the two countries. A search in Slovenian may find something, and if found I will change to keep, but in the meantime delete. --Russavia ^Dialogue 13:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not for miscellaneous information consisting of juxtapositions of countries noting whether they have diplomatic relations. Fails notability as well. Is speedy deletion possible for robo-articles created by now-banned sockpuppets? See the user page of Groubani: [1]. Edison (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some of them turned out to be viable. DGG (talk) 03:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And many didn't, even though speedy deletion and PRODding was contested. This is why they come here en masse. --BlueSquadronRaven 14:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete information is already covered in other articles, there's nothing to these "relations" except two non-resident ambassadors. --BlueSquadronRaven 14:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an article on the Slovene Ministry of foreign affairs web page about a recent meting between the two ministers. I agree that relations aren't particularly notable and the article consists mostly of generic diplomatic babble about how they agreed to improve the already good relations. The only useful fact inside is the amount of trade between the two countries (54 million euros in 2008), but that's probably not enough for an article. So yeah, there probably won't be much harm if this article is deleted. --Yerpo (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Generally relations between two European can reach notability, but in a case like this one, involving one of the less important countries of the EU and a pretty isolationist one, I highly doubt.--Aldux (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^Dialogue 11:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.