Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behzad Ghorbani (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Behzad Ghorbani[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP may fail WP:ACADEMIC Excutient^Talk 12:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any evidence of passing WP:ACADEMIC. Google Scholar shows no citations for the paper announcing the Dugesia species. Jfire (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability as pee WP:ACADEMIC. Very meager citation count. Jeppiz (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ACADEMIC.
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:PROF. Under general guidelines, there is a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. As a scholar, he research on planaria is important (I did some lab work on planaria at SUNY New Paltz as an undergraduate research assistant for my mentor Doug Baker). But that does not necessarily make him notable. In any case, there's not evidence he has won major awards or grants. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.