Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased apparently amateur film with no sign of meeting WP:NFILM. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ONEDAY and lack of notability. Only search results are self-referential. Endorse deletion of Logan Hinson as well. Erik (talk | contribs) 07:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I remember seeing this when it was PRODed and was unable to find any sourcing for this film then. Other than Hinson himself promoting the film, there just isn't anything out there.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nowhere near the standard of WP:Notability (films). JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. With no sources provided other than the production company's own web site, and no listing in the Internet Movie Database yet, this film does not yet meet the criteria for inclusion for future films. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't seem to find any external sources referring to this. A self referenced amateur film that fails WP:NFF. Funny ^Pika! 18:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is simply TOO SOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:57, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete under WP:NFF. No WP:SIGCOV to warrant a standalone this early. May not even be a notable film. Mkdw ^talk 01:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.