Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begin 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Begin (computer game). Exact target not binding, as this is an editorial decision, but a merge should take place and I will check in 4 weeks to ensure it has been done. Fritzpoll (talk) 19:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Begin 2

The article does not seem to establish any notability for the subject nor indeed much explanation of what it exactly is. ~~Merge to a general list of Star Trek games.~~ Alastairward (talk) 18:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(copied from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begin (computer game)) If you're for a merge into a list of Star Trek games, what is the point of this AfD? Are you actually proposing that anything be deleted? Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 19:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right, as I said in other AFDs, my bad, delete, no merge. Scrub this article as lacking in notability. Alastairward (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into a revised Star Trek (text game) to parallel Star Trek (role-playing game). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkmurray (talk • contribs)

No! Star Trek (text game) is its own, distinct game that is not related to Begin 2. --Kiz o r 22:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification - Sorry to be unclear (and forgetting to sign). I meant merge all of the text articles (Trek73, Star Trek (text game), Begin (computer game), Begin 2, Super Star Trek, Netrek, Apple Trek, Star Trek (script game)) into Star Trek (text game) and that article becomes a general article and not just an article about that particular text game. They could also be merged into a new article. In short, I prefer merge over delete. --Kkmurray (talk) 01:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No assertion of real-world context and therefore no notability; no need to merge what's not notable, either. Notability isn't inherited. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 18:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Begin (computer game). Home of the Underdogs and Abandonia thought the game worthy of an article. [1] [2] Begin 2 had much greater circulation than Begin 1 but as game development has resumed [3] it makes sense to have the page under the general series name. --Robin Moshe (talk) 00:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - This is a classic and notable Star Trek game. Even the nom does not want to delete the article. The nom has nominated this article for a merge. Why is this an AfD? Let's bring this AfD to a speedy end (keep), and move the merge discussion to the talk page.Varbas (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy delete~~, as I said before, I'll be specific and say delete, no merge. If needs be I can resubmit it. Alastairward (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nom should not be casting vote in AfD Varbas (talk) 12:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion is a separate process. I'm assuming you're not referring to that? Anyway, regardless of what the nominator says, it doesn't qualify for speedy keep now because other editors have expressed opinions for deleting the article. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 23:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Begin. Refs there seem fine, and this is a version thereof. Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.