Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bec d'Epicoune
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 09:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Bec d'Epicoune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
poorly written and lack nobility. ElectricalExperiment 16:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This article is not against Wikipedia's notability guidelines and the fact that it's a stub should have no bearing on its existance - there are thousands of stubs on Wikipedia. JonCatalán (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Major geographical features such as this are inherently notable, particularly one that marks the border between two nations. A "poorly written" stub of a notable topic is a WP:SOFIXIT issue where deletion is not the solution. --Oakshade (talk) 19:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Major geographic features are notable. Bec d'Epicoune is a valid mountain stub. Sources are widely available to verify it. • Gene93k (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep mountain apparently exists and as such, is inherently notable. Current state is not a reason for deletion, but rather clean up. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per everyone but nominator. Edward321 (talk) 13:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per precedent, all verifiable major geographical features, such as mountains, are notable. Sandstein 20:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.