Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beavercreek Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments have been made for this article's inclusion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beavercreek Band

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Liffer (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC) Page devoted to a high school band. While there are some links to local news articles, substantial information appears to be original research (see WP:OR) and the entire page appears to violate WP:NOTABLE. While the music program is undoubtedly important to its members, there is no significant coverage in neutral news media. The band also already has an entire section on the school's wiki page, which is more than any other group, club, or team has.[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.