Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beauty blender
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Beauty blender (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real content. The words "beauty" and "blender", when used together, don't need to have an article. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as entirely unconvincing, simply a mere guide listing. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG Article lacks independent reliable sources. Beautyblender is actually the name of a brand of makeup sponges. Can't see a need for this article. CBS527Talk 02:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - adds no relevant information. WP is not a product list. DrStrauss talk 12:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.